Logo of the osteo-health blog with paediatric osteopathy.

Osteopathy sees itself as a patient-centred, evidence-based approach that integrates various disciplines. Viewed holistically, the interactions between structure and function form the basis for the self-sustaining and regulating processes in the body. The therapeutic relationship, which is partly based on touch, serves to restore and maintain well-being and health. 

 

There is still a lack of an integrative meta-framework within the osteopathic community that takes into account contextual factors, language, education and non-verbal communication in addition to the manual treatment component. Jorge Estevs and colleagues have addressed the question of how to reconceptualise a unified framework without changing osteopathic care per se in a recent article. The basic ideas will be briefly explored in this article.

 

The authors work out two central concepts, those of enactivism and active inference. Enactivism refers to the subject's process of perception from its environment, which leads to intelligent action, while inference refers to those statements that lead to a logical conclusion through examination. Furthermore, active inference serves to logically reflect on and adapt the consequences of one's own actions.

 

The two concepts can work together as (en)active inference to reveal the mechanisms within osteopathy that underlie interprofessional and intra-therapeutic exchange. 

 

The dyadic exchange between osteopath and patient offers both a range of different options for action. This can restore and/or promote individual adaptability. The therapeutic relationship thrives on the creation of a therapeutic space, meaningful images and the re-evaluation of disease symptoms. In addition to these factors, manual touch contributes significantly to the development of the therapeutic relationship by creating synchronisation between osteopath and patient. Touch plays a decisive role in the regulation of allostasis and homeostasis, particularly in the care of (small) children.

 

The authors argue that active therapeutic inference favours the development of a robust therapeutic dyad and is therefore critical to the effectiveness of osteopathic treatment. The framework presented is intended to set the course for the development and validation of an integrative model for osteopathic care. Clinical practice could thus develop psychologically in order to strengthen its own self-perception mechanisms and interpretations. In particular, the treatment of persistent physical symptoms, such as chronic pain, could benefit from the addition of emotional and cognitive factors (Esteves et al. 2022).

Literature

Esteves JE, Cerritelli F, Kim J, et al. Osteopathic Care as (En)active Inference: A Theoretical Framework for Developing an Integrative Hypothesis in Osteopathy. Front Psychol. 2022;13(February):1-19

Osteopathic treatment as (en)active inference

Osteopathy sees itself as a patient-centred, evidence-based approach that integrates various disciplines. From a holistic point of view, the interactions between structure and function form the basis for the self-maintaining and regulating processes in the body. The therapeutic relationship, which is partly based on touch, serves to restore and maintain well-being and health. 

 

There is still a lack of an integrative meta-framework within the osteopathic profession that takes into account contextual factors, language, education and non-verbal communication in addition to the manual treatment component. The question of how to reconceptualise a unified framework without changing osteopathic care per se has been addressed by Jorge Estevs and colleagues in a recent article. The basic ideas will be briefly highlighted in this article.

 

The authors elaborate two central concepts, that of enactivism and active inference. Here, enactivism refers to the subject's process of perception from its environment, through which intelligent action is derived, and inference refers to those statements through whose verification one arrives at a logical conclusion. Furthermore, active inference serves to logically reflect and adjust consequences of one's own actions.

 

The two concepts can work together as (en)active inference to reveal the mechanisms within osteopathy that underlie interprofessional as well as intratherapeutic exchange. 

 

The dyadic exchange between osteopaths and patients offers both a range of different possibilities for action. In this way, individual adaptability can be restored and/or promoted. The therapeutic relationship here thrives on the creation of a therapeutic space, meaningful images and the re-evaluation of symptoms of illness. In addition to these factors, manual touch contributes significantly to the development of the therapeutic relationship by creating synchronicity between osteopath and patient. Especially in the care of (young) children, touch plays the crucial role in regulating allostasis and homeostasis.

 

The authors argue that active therapeutic inference fosters the development of a robust therapeutic dyad and is thus instrumental in the effectiveness of osteopathic treatment. The framework presented is intended to set the stage for the development and validation of an integrative model for osteopathic care. Clinical practice could thus evolve psychologically to strengthen its own self-perception mechanisms and interpretations. In particular, the treatment of persistent physical symptoms, such as chronic pain, could benefit from expansion with emotional and cognitive factors (Esteves et al. 2022).

Literature

Esteves JE, Cerritelli F, Kim J, et al. Osteopathic Care as (En)active Inference: A Theoretical Framework for Developing an Integrative Hypothesis in Osteopathy. Front Psychol. 2022;13(February):1-19

en_GBEnglish